Re: Redundant web pages

• To: www-security@ns2.rutgers.edu
• Subject: Re: Redundant web pages
• From: Martin Hamilton <martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>
• Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 12:24:30 +0100
• In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 May 1996 15:51:31 PDT." <31990E73.6559@hydra.acs.uci.edu>

Dan Stromberg writes:

| 3) Push for an extension to DNS, to handle "any of these N hosts are
| dandy for satisfying requests to this address", ala MX records.  It
| seems like something more general than protocol-specific facilities may
| be called for.  At first blush, it seems that an MX record-analog, that
| is a function not just of host, but also of port # and tcp/udp/whatever,
| might work well.  Of course, DNS requests do not generally indicate what
| service is going to be used, so the problem isn't Quite that simple.

Take a look at ...  <URL:ftp://ftp.internic.net/internet-drafts/internet
-drafts/draft-gulbrandsen-dns-rr-srvcs-03.txt>

Martin

• Re: Redundant web pages
• From: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@hydra.acs.uci.edu>

• Previous: Article: ``Rogue Java roaming Net...''
• Next: Re: Redundant web pages
• Index(es):
  • Index
  • Thread